MASTER'S THESIS INFORMATION
1. Student's full name:Do Xuan Anh
2. Gender: Male
3. Date of birth: June 7, 1987
4. Place of birth: Hanoi.
5. Student recognition decision No. 3683/2015/QD-XHNV dated December 31, 2015 of the President of the University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Vietnam National University, Hanoi.
6. Changes in training process: none
7. Thesis topic name:“Building a system of criteria for reviewing international cooperation tasks on science and technology according to the Protocol”
8. Major: Science and Technology Management Code: 60.34.04.12
9. Scientific instructor:Associate Professor, Dr. Mai Ha
10. Summary of thesis results:
- Based on the current status of the criteria system for reviewing international cooperation tasks on science and technology according to the protocol, the study points out the limitations and inadequacies in the process of managing and reviewing tasks.
- Review the process of classifying and approving international cooperation tasks on science and technology according to the protocol.
- Based on the strategic goals of science and technology development until 2020, research and develop a system of criteria for reviewing international cooperation tasks on science and technology according to the protocol.
11. Practical application:
Highly feasible.
12. Further research directions: None.
13. Published works related to the thesis: None.
INFORMATION ON MASTER'S THESIS
1. Full name: Do Xuan AnhH 2. Sex: Male
3. Date of birth: June 7, 1987 4. Place of birth: Hanoi
5. Admission decision number: 3683/2015/QD-XHNV, Dated: Dec 31, 2015 of the Director of the Social Sciences and Humanities University, Hanoi National University.
6. Changes in academic process: none
7. Official thesis title: Establishing the criteria for evaluation of science and technology tasks in conformity with the protocol
8. Major: Science and Technology Management Code: 60.34.04.12
9. Supervisors: Assoc Prof. Dr. Mai Ha
10. Summary of the findings of the thesis:
- Based on the current state of the criteria for evaluation of science and technology tasks in conformity with the protocol, the research shows the indicate the limitations and inadequacies in evaluation and management of science and technology tasks in conformity with the protocol.
- Review the process of classifying and evaluating of science and technology tasks in conformity with the protocol.
- Based on the strategic objectives of science and technology development until 2020, study and establish the criteria for appraisalof science and technology tasks in conformity with the protocol.
11. Practical applicability, if any:
Highly feasible
12. Further research directions, if any: No
13. Thesis-related publications: No
Newer news
Older news