INFORMATION ABOUT THE MASTER'S THESIS
1. Student's full name:Do Xuan Anh
2. Gender: Male
3. Date of birth: June 7, 1987
4. Place of birth: Hanoi.
5. Decision No. 3683/2015/QD-XHNV dated December 31, 2015, of the Rector of the University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, recognizing the student.
6. Changes in the training process: none
7. Thesis title:"Developing a system of criteria for reviewing international cooperation projects in science and technology under the Protocol"
8. Major: Science and Technology Management Code: 60.34.04.12
9. Scientific supervisor:Assoc. Prof. Dr. Mai Ha
10. Summary of the thesis results:
- Based on the current system of criteria for reviewing international cooperation projects in science and technology under the protocol, the study points out limitations and shortcomings in the management and review process of these projects.
- Review the process of classifying and approving international cooperation tasks in science and technology according to the protocol.
- Based on the strategic goals for science and technology development until 2020, research will be conducted to develop a system of criteria for reviewing international cooperation projects in science and technology according to protocols.
11. Practical applications:
It is highly feasible.
12. Future research directions: None.
13. Published works related to the thesis: None.
INFORMATION ON MASTER'S THESIS
1. Full name: Do Xuan AnhH 2. Sex: Male
3. Date of birth: June 7, 1987 4. Place of birth: Hanoi
5. Admission decision number: 3683/2015/QD-XHNV, Dated: Dec 31, 2015 of the Director of the Social Sciences and Humanities University, Hanoi National University.
6. Changes in academic process: none
7. Official thesis title: Establishing the criteria for evaluation of science and technology tasks in conformity with the protocol
8. Major: Science and Technology Management Code: 60.34.04.12
9. Supervisors: Assoc Prof. Dr. Mai Ha
10. Summary of the findings of the thesis:
- Based on the current state of the criteria for evaluation of science and technology tasks in conformity with the protocol, the research shows the indicate the limitations and inadequacies in evaluation and management of science and technology tasks in conformity with the protocol.
- Review the process of classifying and evaluating of science and technology tasks in conformity with the protocol.
- Based on the strategic objectives of science and technology development until 2020, study and establish the criteria for appraisalof science and technology tasks in conformity with the protocol.
11. Practical applicability, if any:
Pure
12. Further research directions, if any: No
13. Thesis-related publications: No
Newer news
Older news