Students of the Institute of Journalism and Communication (University of Social Sciences and Humanities, VNU Hanoi) during a practical lesson in television - Photo: HL
Because schools are training "citizen journalists" to become "professional journalists."
Never forget the exam
I will never forget the final exam of my master’s course in international journalism in 2007. The test maker and journalism instructor, Peter Eng, was working for the Associated Press at the time. The final exam was about 10 pages long, including multiple choice and open-ended questions. It was really hard to pass!
Peter warned us at the beginning of the course that it would be a demanding one. The exam was about how to write a newspaper, but we had to memorize a lot of principles about what constitutes news, how to think about the topic, and a lot of facts about how to behave, even considering the impact on the public. Many of the things we learned from the exam stayed with us in our teaching, research, and later in our talks and speeches.
Many journalists and journalism educators regard the past decades as the height of professional journalism because it was an era of abundant resources supporting powerful news organizations and newsrooms. Journalists and newsrooms had a near monopoly on the daily news cycle.
When everyone can call themselves a "citizen journalist" or "editor-in-chief" of their own page, and the logos of Facebook or Google become familiar to more than half of the global population, the need to read news from mass media has cooled down.
Mr. Alan Rusbridger, with 20 years of experience as editor-in-chief of the prestigious newspaper The Guardian, recently warned: "For the first time in modern history, we are facing the prospect of what society would be like without reliable news."
Adapting to change
Public attention and debate has shifted to digital media. Young people born after 1995, often labelled as “Digital Natives”, “Instantly Online Age Group”, “Dotcom Children”, have had a long childhood spent on social media and with access to electronic devices.
Grasping technology no longer takes as much time as it used to when entering university.
A lecturer at Boston University (USA) was talking to a colleague about how to teach journalism. He emphasized that it is not new technologies but traditional values in reporting that make a person a good journalist, helping to elevate their work above the level of mediocrity.
Teaching a set of skills that will be obsolete in five years is no longer the priority in journalism schools, but rather training them to think and teach themselves over the long term.
Today, Donald Trump’s Twitter account has nearly 75 million followers and the New York Times has about 4 million paying readers. The two worlds still exist side by side.
It just goes to show that as long as there is an audience, the medium will always exist and journalists will always have a responsibility to their audience. Carl Bernstein once said: "Good journalism should challenge people, not just entertain them." Social media is and will do the latter better.
Technology may grow up with us, but perhaps professional journalism thinking still needs to "start" in school and be honed in press agencies.
My exam 13 years ago touched on the ethics and responsibilities of journalists, regardless of the medium or platform; the ability to verify information, regardless of the era; and sensitivity to information, regardless of the historical timeline.
The box no longer exists Journalism education can only survive and succeed if it becomes more actively seeking change. It has to become much more creative than it has been in the past. It is not a matter of thinking outside the box, because the box no longer exists. |
According to Tuoi Tre Online
Author:TTO
Newer news
Older news