The University of Social Sciences and Humanities announced the results of the first round of the Academic Advising Competition and the tasks to be done to prepare for the second round - "Responsibility".
1. Results of the "Companion" round
- The individuals awarded for achieving the highest results in the "Companion" round are: MSc. Do Thi Thuy Lan (Faculty of History), Dr. Nguyen Thi Phuong Thuy (Faculty of Linguistics), MSc. Tran Phuong Hoa (Faculty of Archival and Office Administration), MSc. Hoang Cam Giang (Faculty of Literature), MSc. Hoang Hong Nga (Faculty of History), MSc. Phan Thi Hoang Mai (Faculty of Philosophy) - The teams participating in the "Responsibility" round are: History, Philosophy, Literature Pedagogy, Social Work, Archival and Office Administration, Sociology, Tourism Studies, Management Science.
Exam results:
| TT |
Team |
Branch |
Total score |
Order |
| 1 |
History Pedagogy |
History Pedagogy |
70.5 |
1 |
| 2 |
Philosophy |
Philosophy |
69.8 |
2 |
| 3 |
Literature Pedagogy |
Literature Pedagogy |
68.7 |
3 |
| 4 |
History |
History |
68.1 |
4 |
| 5 |
Social work |
Social work |
68.0 |
5 |
| 6 |
LTH&QTVP |
LTH&QTVP |
68.0 |
6 |
| 7 |
Sociology |
Sociology |
67.3 |
7 |
| 8 |
Study tour |
Study tour |
64.7 |
8 |
| 9 |
Management science |
Management science |
63.9 |
9 |
| 10 |
Library information |
Library information |
63.3 |
10 |
| 11 |
Linguistics |
Linguistics |
62.3 |
11 |
| 12 |
Literature |
Literature |
61.8 |
12 |
| 13 |
Han Nom |
Han Nom |
51.5 |
13 |
| 14 |
Psychology |
Psychology |
50.3 |
14 |
| 15 |
Anthropology |
Anthropology |
47.0 |
15 |
| 16 |
Orientalism |
Orientalism |
46.7 |
16 |
| 17 |
Press |
Press |
42.7 |
17 |
| 18 |
Political Science |
Political Science |
42.5 |
18 |
| 19 |
International Studies |
International Studies |
42.0 |
19 |
Note: 8 teams competed in the second round, in which the History Pedagogy and History majors were combined into 1 team according to the proposal of the History Faculty.
2. Prepare for the “Responsibility” round
- Each team participating in round 2 must have at least 3 academic advisors (no maximum limit) and the team leader must be a member of the Board of Directors of the affiliated faculty/department. The head of the unit is responsible for ensuring the minimum number of members of the team. - Details on the time, organization method and scoring criteria of the "Responsibility" round can be found at the end of this page. - A maximum of 2 million VND from the regular university training support fund allocated to faculties will be provided to support staff participating in the "Responsibility" round.
3. Invitation to join the Jury of the "Responsibility" round
The exam in the “Responsibility” round is graded in 2 parts: Written exam and Presentation exam. In the presentation exam, the Organizing Committee invited the departments of Information – Library, Linguistics, each department sent 2 academic advisors to participate in the Judging Panel in the respective grading sessions at 6:00 p.m., April 20, 2011 and 6:00 p.m., April 21, 2011 on the 5th floor, Building H.
ORGANIZING AND SCORING THE "RESPONSIBILITY" ROUND
1. Exam schedule
a) Marking written tests- Teams submit their entries before 11am, April 18, 2011 at the Training Department. - The Jury will judge from 2pm to 5pm, April 18, 2011.
b) Presentation marking- Contest order
- 6pm April 20
- Social work
- Study tour
- History
- Philosophy
- 6pm April 21
- Management science
- Archival Science and Office Administration
- Literature
- Sociology
- Implementation method: + Team representative presents: Maximum 5 minutes + Team discusses with the Board of Examiners, representative of the team not competing in round 2, student representative about the content of the written test: Maximum 25 minutes for both questions and answers and debate. + Board of Examiners representative presents the Board of Examiners' comments on the content of the written test. + Board of Examiners meets separately to conclude the score for each team after each day of marking. At the end of the marking session on April 21, 2011, the Board of Examiners summarizes the results of round 2, and selects the team to compete in the final round.
2. Scoring criteria
a) Written test- Analyze the advantages and difficulties that students encounter during the learning process: Maximum 10 points - Clarify the responsibilities of CVHT: Maximum 8 points - Clarify the responsibilities of the training unit's leaders: Maximum 8 points - Clarify the responsibilities of the School (Board of Directors, functional departments): Maximum 8 points - There are 2 solutions to improve the effectiveness of the unit's academic advising work proposed and have an explanation of feasibility: Maximum 16 points
Note: The test must ensure the topic (responsibility of the subjects) and the system between the 4 contents mentioned above. There is no limit on the length of the article. It is necessary to have actual documents to prove the arguments.
b) Presentation test- Active and effective participation of the Team Leader: Maximum 10 points. - Level of use of practical materials during the debate: Maximum 10 points. - Clearly demonstrating understanding of the regulations and training program: Maximum 15 points. - Successfully defending proposed solutions: Maximum 15 points.
3. Conclusion: The score for each team is the average score of the members of the Jury, 02 representatives of teams not participating in round 2, 02 student representatives.
